USPTO serial 79328174
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software (recorded); computer game software; computer game software, recorded; computer programs (downloadable software); computer programmes (programs), recorded; computer software applications, downloadable; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; monitors (computer programs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer system analysis; recovery of computer data; graphic arts design; off-site data backup; research in the field of telecommunications technology; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the internet; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; providing search engines for the internet; installation of computer software; information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis; computer programming; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; conversion of computer programs and data, other than physical conversion; computer technology consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; internet security consultancy; data security consultancy; information technology (IT) consultancy; computer software consultancy; computer security consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; website design consultancy; monitoring of computer systems for detecting unauthorized access or data breach; monitoring of computer systems to detect breakdowns; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; digitization of documents (scanning); user authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions; user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; hosting computer sites (web sites); data encryption services; computer virus protection services; software as a service (SaaS); computer system design; computer software design; rental of web servers; computer rental; rental of computer software; industrial design; development of computer platforms; software development in the framework of software publishing; creating and maintaining websites for others; creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others (information technology services); technological consultancy; cloud computing; server hosting | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 29, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 10, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 1, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 4, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |