USPTO serial 79328630
LINKV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LINKV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software applications, downloadable; network communication devices; smartphones; electronic publications, downloadable; remote control apparatus for home use; camcorders; eyeglasses; mobile power supply (rechargeable batteries); animated cartoons; downloadable image files | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Transmission of electronic mail; computer aided transmission of messages and images; videoconferencing services; providing user access to global computer networks; providing access to databases; message sending; providing internet chatrooms; electronic bulletin board services [telecommunications services]; communications by computer terminals; transmission of digital files; providing online forums | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer software design; updating computer programs for third parties; information technology [IT] consultancy; conversion of data or documents from physical to electronic media; data conversion of computer programs and data [not physical conversion]; development of computer platforms; software as a service [SaaS]; providing information on computer technology and programming via a web site; electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet; electronic monitoring of credit card activity to detect fraud via the internet; electronic data storage; design and development of computer software; platform as a service [PaaS]; design and development of application software for mobile phones; software development in the framework of software publishing; creating and maintaining web sites for others; cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 5, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 28, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 6, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |