USPTO serial 79328762
LOGOS EMPOWERED LOGIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LOGOS EMPOWERED LOGIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software, namely, software and software applications for electronic payments and payment systems; software and software applications for the processing of receipt and submission of electronic payments; software for the processing of images, graphics and text; software for facilitating secure credit card transactions; apparatus for electronic payment processing; electronic payment terminals; terminals for money dispensing and sorting devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Processing of electronic payments; electronic processing of payments via a global computer network; payment handling; payment administration services; collection of payments for goods and services; financial transactions clearing via a global computer network; provision of banking and financial services via a global computer network; financial services, including services that enable the transfer of capital and purchase of products and services offered by third parties via electronic communications networks, including the internet and mobile networks; payment services, including credit card services, processing and transfer of payments and payment services and issuance of payment guarantees; electronic transfers of funds; financial services which clear for a person's or company's payment ability; financial services which clear for gambling addiction | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the processing of electronic payments; design and development of computer hardware and computer software for electronic payment systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 29, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |