USPTO serial 79328789
SCAMEC THOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLLOPY, DIANE PATRICIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 137
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SCAMEC THOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL T. SMITH
MICHAEL T. SMITH BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH LLP8110 GATEHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 100EFALLS, VA 22042UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Machines for use in building and underground mining, construction, ground consolidation and tunneling, namely, mineworking machines, excavating machines, tunnel boring and drilling machines, spraying machines, man lifting machines, elevators, rock scaling machines, lifting installations for material and personnel transport in underground construction; machine tools for drilling and boring, mining drill sharpeners, power-operated spray guns, all of the foregoing for use in building and underground mining, construction, ground consolidation and tunneling; electric power tools, namely, saw machines, electrical drills, electrical hammers; pneumatic tools, namely, pneumatic conveyors, pneumatic hammers, pneumatic transporters; pneumatic control mechanisms as integral parts for machines, engine and motors; machines and apparatus for material handling, lifting, drilling, charging, blasting, scaling, spraying, haulage and transportation, and parts thereto, in particular, rock supporting machinery, roof bolters, rock drills, pneumatic hammers, nozzles being parts of spraying machines, cranes, hoists, shotcrete spraying machines, robotic, platform, and spraying booms for the distribution of concrete, air compressors, high pressure washers, high pressure pneumatic pumps, mechanical cable reels, gas and fluid tanks being parts of machines, gas and electric welding machines; concrete and cement mixers; mobile elevating work platforms | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Land vehicles for use in underground mining, construction ground consolidation and tunnelling; mine cars and mine trucks with special equipment and devices for material handling and for lifting, drilling, charging, blasting, scaling, spraying, haulage and transportation; underground mining, construction ground consolidation and tunnelling maintenance and utility land vehicles; underground multi-purpose land vehicles; land vehicles with mobile underground working platforms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 18, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 28, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2025 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 8, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 2, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 13, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2021 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |