USPTO serial 79329170
NAGASE FOOD INGREDIENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PATEL, SAMIR RAMESH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NAGASE FOOD INGREDIENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals for industry; chemical compositions for preserving foodstuffs; chemical preparations for preserving foodstuffs; chemical preservatives for the food industry; chemicals for preserving foodstuffs; antioxidants for use in the manufacture of food and beverages; proteins for use in the manufacture of food and beverages; antioxidants for use in the manufacture of food supplements; proteins for use in the manufacture of food supplements; fatty acid; artificial sweetener; flour for industrial purposes; flour and starch for industrial purposes; bread improvers [flour treatment agents]; chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail services or wholesale services for food and beverages; retail services or wholesale services for chemicals; retail services or wholesale services for chemical additives for use in the manufacture of food; retail services or wholesale services for supplement; retail services or wholesale services for natural sweetener; retail services or wholesale services for artificial sweetener; retail services or wholesale services for confectionery and bread; retail services or wholesale services for rice and cereals; retail services or wholesale services for seasoning, other than spices; business management of import-export; agency of commercial transactions; procurement of goods on behalf of other businesses; providing commercial information; business and management consultancy; market research and analysis; advertising; planning services for advertising and production of advertisements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 22, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 2, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |