Drawing for MONEYSATNAV

USPTO serial 79329219

MONEYSATNAV

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KERTGATE, AMY L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONEYSATNAV?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER D. SILVERMAN

JENNIFER D. SILVERMAN JENNIFER SILVERMAN PLLCSUITE 331348 WEST 57TH STREETNEW YORK, NY 10019

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable financial management softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 29, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 15, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 15, 2025MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 15, 2025ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 15, 2025EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 1, 2024EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jul 11, 2024GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2024GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 11, 2024CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
May 14, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 9, 2024GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2024GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2024CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 12, 2024TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 12, 2024CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2024ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2024EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 2024JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 9, 2024EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 9, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 9, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 9, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 11, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 10, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 11, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 7, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 9, 2023GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2023GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 2023CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 5, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 2, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 21, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 21, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 19, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 18, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 4, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance