USPTO serial 79329239
I.A.N.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUDSON, TAMARA BREE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with I.A.N.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milano (MI), IT
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware for telecommunications; computers and computer hardware; computer software; computer software packages; downloadable software applications; software for smartphones; computer programmes for data processing; interactive business software; artificial intelligence software; web application software; downloadable mobile applications for the management of data | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale services, including via the internet, of hardware and software | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair of computer hardware; installation of hardware for computer systems; installation, maintenance and repair of computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Computer communication services; communication services by electronic means | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Configuration of computer software; installation of computer software; computer hardware development; design of computer hardware; testing of computer hardware; design and development of computer hardware architecture; configuring computer hardware using software; diagnosing computer hardware problems using software; developing and updating computer software; information technology (IT) consultancy services; design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; providing user authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 19, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 17, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 3, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |