Drawing for ULTRA FLEX

USPTO serial 79329325

ULTRA FLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ULTRA FLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Apparatus and instruments for conducting, switching, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling the distribution or use of electricity; accumulators [batteries]; accumulators, electric; accumulators, electric, for vehicles; electric cells; electrical cells and batteries; primary cells; rechargeable cells; cells [electric]; chargeable batteries; electric batteries; electric batteries for powering electric vehicles; electric batteries for vehicles; electric storage batteries; electrical batteries; electrical storage batteries; lithium batteries; lithium ion batteries; lithium secondary batteries; sodium ion batteries; rechargeable batteries; rechargeable electric batteries; batteries; batteries for electric vehicles; batteries for vehicles; batteries, electric; batteries, electric, for vehicles; galvanic batteries; ignition batteries; battery chargers; electric battery chargers; power units [batteries]; uninterruptible power supply apparatus [battery]; battery boxes; battery jars; battery packs; battery adapters; batteries for use in automotive sector; re-chargeable batteries for use in automotive sector; batteries for use in oil and gas sector; cylindrical battery cells for use in oil and gas sector; single use cylindrical battery cells for use in oil and gas sector; batteries for use in energy storage systems; re-chargeable batteries for use in energy storage systems; software; software for monitoring, transforming, accumulating, regulating or controlling electricity, electricity consumption, charging of batteries, batteries and battery chargers; parts, fittings and accessories for all of the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 24, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 12, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 24, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 24, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 24, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 24, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 2, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 12, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 12, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jul 7, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jul 6, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Dec 23, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance