USPTO serial 79329371
SCION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEYERS, MORGAN LAURA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erica Halstead
Erica Halstead Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 Third Ave.Suite 2400New York, NY 10022Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | recorded and downloadable computer software for analyzing, processing and forwarding telecommunications data and operating telecommunications networks in the field of information technology architecture and infrastructure | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication services, namely, local and long distance transmission of voice, data, graphics, and video by means of broadband optical or wireless networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information technology services, namely, information technology (IT) consulting services, information technology engineering, outsource service providers in the field of information technology; Research services in the field of information technology; project management services, namely in the field of IT project management, and in the field of design, development, programming and implementation of computer hardware, software and peripherals; consultant and information services with respect to information technology architecture and infrastructure; design and development of software architecture and telecommunication equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 21, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 6, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 12, 2026 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 17, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 26, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 12, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 24, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 3, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |