Drawing for HYDROGEN NEXT

USPTO serial 79329657

HYDROGEN NEXT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 411
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGREDA, SAMANTHA LEIGH
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 123

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HYDROGEN NEXT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Aimee Gessner

Aimee Gessner Bayerische Motoren Werke AGPetuelring 130Dept. AJ-55Munich, 80809

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land vehiclesSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2023LIMELIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED AND ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Sep 2, 2023LIMGLIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB—
Jun 19, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
May 31, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
May 31, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Apr 25, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 18, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 18, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 21, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 25, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Apr 7, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Apr 7, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Mar 31, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Mar 30, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Dec 30, 2021REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance