USPTO serial 79329964
ADDITIV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 654
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADDITIV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Boulevard, NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded software for trading securities electronically; Recorded software for advice on asset and financial management procedures and processing; Recorded software for customer relationship management (CRM); Recorded software for advice on credit service procedures and processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial affairs, in particular financial management; monetary affairs, in particular financial management | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological services, in particular consulting in the technology field of computer software platforms for wealth management, computer project management and implementation of computer technologies of projects for providing advice with respect to financial investments and for financial management of the design relating thereto; industrial research services for software systems for financial management, all the aforementioned services not being in connection with additives; design and development of computer software for investment advice and financial management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 5, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 4, 2025 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Dec 13, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 31, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 15, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Dec 30, 2021 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |