Drawing for TOP FLIGHT

USPTO serial 79330474

TOP FLIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 405
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWNE, LUCY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP FLIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bradley M. Stohry

Bradley M. Stohry Reichel Stohry Dean LLP525 S. Meridian St., Suite 1A2Indianapolis, IN 46225UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Apparatus for games adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor; apparatus for games; game machines, automatic and coin-operated; gaming machines for gambling; poker machines (amusement machines, automatic and coin operated)SECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2023TRPTREQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION PROCESSED - TOTAL—
Apr 4, 2023ERFTTEAS REQUEST FOR TRANSFORMATION RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2023DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED—
Mar 27, 2023DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Dec 21, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Nov 28, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Nov 28, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 21, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 20, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Jan 7, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance