USPTO serial 79330524
SMART LANE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRADLEY, EVELYN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SMART LANE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal road barricades and lane dividers; metal cavity barriers and dividers; hazard warning barriers (metal fixed and movable); emergency barriers (metal fixed and moveable); guidance barriers of metal (fixed and moveable); metal gates; emergency gates and barriers of metal; crash barriers of metal; metal boom and pole gates; metal signage; parts and fittings for the aforesaid goods in this class | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Remote and automated controlled apparatus being computer software, data processing equipment, computers, digital and video cameras and motion sensors for monitoring, observing, regulating and counting vehicle traffic; computer software, data processing equipment; computer hardware; automated apparatus for opening, moving, pivoting and closing of gates, barriers, boom gates and lane and road dividers; computer operated automated apparatus for transmitting and receiving signals for the opening, closing, pivoting and movement of gates, barriers and of traffic channelizers; automated sensors for triggering of opening and closing of barriers, gates, boom gates, boom poles and lane dividers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 26, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 4, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 15, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 1, 2023 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 2, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 4, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |