USPTO serial 79330585
R.A.W.LIFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARRETT, LEAH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with R.A.W.LIFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angel Roman Campos
Angel Roman Campos MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.125 S. Royal St.,Alexandria, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Canned sliced vegetables; vegetables, dried; vegetables, cooked; jellies, jams, compotes; eggs; corn oil for food; nut oils for food; processed peanuts; ginger jam; coconut fat; fruit-based organic food snacks; raisins; peanut butter; cocoa butter for food; coconut oil for food; sesame oil for food; linseed oil for food; olive oil for food; almonds, ground; almond milk for culinary purposes; peanut milk for culinary purposes; rice milk; soya milk; processed coconut; prepared nuts; tahini; processed dates; glazed fruits; processed fruits being cooked fruits; prepared hazelnuts; potato chips; low-fat potato chips; fruit chips; all of the goods being processed and none of the foregoing consisting of or based upon raw ingredients nor containing dairy or dairy substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Coffee; tea; tapioca; sago; pastries; bread; confectionery, namely, pastila; ice creams; sugar; honey; molasses for food; yeast; baking powder; salt; mustard; vinegar; seasonings; spices; ice for refreshment; star aniseed for use as a flavoring in food and drink; high-protein cereal bars; peanut confectionery, namely, marzipan; almond confectionery; cocoa; cinnamon powder [spice]; nut flours; muesli; flaxseed for use as a seasoning; sorbets; chocolate; all of the goods being processed and none of the foregoing consisting of or based upon raw ingredients nor containing dairy or dairy substitute | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Non-alcoholic fruit juice beverages, namely, smoothies; non-alcoholic beverages containing fruit juices; fruit juice; fruit nectars; syrups for making beverages, especially soft drinks; non-alcoholic fruit extracts used in the preparation of beverages; non-alcoholic rice-based beverages not being milk substitutes; soya-based beverages, other than milk substitutes; aloe vera drinks; none of the foregoing containing dairy and dairy-substitutes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 28, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 11, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |