USPTO serial 79330587
O. B. DESIGNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRUZADO, SAMANTHA LEE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with O. B. DESIGNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Baby teething rings; teething soothers, namely, teethers; teething chains for relieving teething pain; teething rings for relieving teething pain; pacifiers for babies; baby dummies; dummies being baby soothers; baby bottles | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Children's toys, namely, rattles, dolls, and toy animals; cuddly toys, namely, stuffed toys and plush toys; fluffy plush toys; plush figures being toys; plush toys with attached comfort blanket; soft sculpture toys; stuffed toys; infants' toys being playthings; toys adapted for educational purposes, namely, silicone blocks, rings, and towers for stacking, for developing fine motor skills; toys for babies, namely, infant toys; toys for babies when teething, namely, baby rattles and stuffed toys incorporating teething rings; infant toys for use in prams; puzzles; dolls; dolls' clothing; dolls' furniture; dolls' houses; teddy bears; baby playthings, namely, infant toys; children's playthings being play mats containing infant toys; climbing frames being playthings for children; educational playthings for developing fine motor skills, cognitive skills and counting skills; playthings, namely, plush sensory balls for infants and children being for sensory play to help infants and children explore their senses and develop hand eye coordination; apparatus for games, namely, game cards; games comprised of wooden and silicone shapes for stacking; educational games for children for developing fine motor skills, cognitive skills, social skills and counting skills; rattles being infants' playthings; rattles for children; infants' swings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 28, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 23, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 22, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 17, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |