USPTO serial 79330758
CHIPLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- O'BRIEN, JENNIFER LYNN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHIPLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Liquid crystal displays; liquid crystal display panel; electroluminescent display panel; thin film transistor liquid crystal display (TFT-LCD) panel; video screens; touch screen | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Electric lamps; filaments for electric lamps; incandescent burners; light-emitting diodes [LED] lighting apparatus; safety lamps; organic light-emitting diodes lighting apparatus; light bulbs; luminous tubes for lighting; discharge tubes, electric, for lighting; lighting apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising by mail order; demonstration of goods; online advertising on a computer network; production of advertising films; dissemination of advertising matter; publicity; advertising; market studies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Homepage and website design; information technology [IT] consultancy; industrial design; technological research; computer security consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; computer programming; updating of computer software; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; integrated circuit design; computer software consultancy | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 26, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 1, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 12, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 18, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 11, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |