USPTO serial 79330909
CHICA. NBCL/MACL THEORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, LUCY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHICA. NBCL/MACL THEORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Scientific research on harassment; scientific research on harassment risk; scientific research on assault crimes; scientific research on criminal law; scientific research on mitigating harassment risk; scientific research on reducing assault crimes; scientific research to reduce crime; scientific research to mitigate harassment risk; scientific research to reduce assault crimes; maintenance of computer software in cloud computing; guidance and advice on computer security and information risk prevention; software upgrades for cloud computing, computer security and information risk aversion; software upgrades for computer security and information risk aversion related to cloud computing; scientific research on the valid requirements of the law on regulation of anti stalking; scientific research on the effective requirements of the nuisance prevention ordinance; scientific research on road traffic law; scientific research on the effective requirements of the nuisance prevention ordinance; scientific research on road traffic law; cloud computing; upgrade of computer software related to computer security and computer risk prevention; guidance and advice on computer security; scientific research on assault crimes in order to mitigate harassment risk; scientific research on criminal law in order to mitigate harassment risk; providing online application software (SaaS) | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal research on laws related to regulation of anti-stalking; legal research on valid requirements on laws on prevention of domestic violence and protection of victims; legal research on valid requirements on laws on assault crimes; legal research on road traffic act; legal research on nuisance prevention regulations; representation or mediation of contracts regarding the use of intellectual property rights; representation or mediation of contracts regarding the use of copyright; representation or mediation of contracts regarding the use of trademark; advice on intellectual property rights; copyright management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 14, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jan 30, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |