USPTO serial 79330975
SEMAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEMAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Transformers; current transformers; high-voltage transformers; distribution transformers; frequency converters; electronic power transformers; electric voltage transformers; capacitive voltage transformers; electrical transformers for telecommunication apparatus; electric current control devices; power connectors; electronic power supplies; high-voltage power supplies; low-voltage power supplies; high-frequency switching power supplies; DC input power supplies; power supplies with usb connector; power supplies for antenna amplifiers; chargers for electric accumulators; battery chargers, electric; portable power chargers; battery chargers; batteries; uninterruptible electrical power supplies; voltmeters; voltage testers; voltage monitor modules; voltage detectors; voltage regulators for electric power; voltage monitoring units; voltage stabilizers; electricity measuring instruments; sensors; sensors for measuring and monitoring the quality of electricity; data detection sensors; sensors for measuring and monitoring air quality; sensors for measuring and monitoring the physical operating quantities of a machine or a molding process; remote temperature sensors; Internet of Things (IoT) sensors; routers for routing audio, video, and digital signals; computer network routers; wireless routers; USB wireless routers; Internet of Things (IoT) range extenders in the nature of antennas; Internet of Things (IoT) gateways; data processing equipment; electric or electronic information storage apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 14, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 4, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 10, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 18, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 21, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |