Drawing for BERRUTO PASTA CUP

USPTO serial 79331660

BERRUTO PASTA CUP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LOZEAU, BRANDON THOMAS
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BERRUTO PASTA CUP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Meat gravies (sauce); alfredo sauce being pasta sauce; tomato sauce; sauces (condiments); fresh pasta; wholemeal pasta; dried pasta; packaged meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; prepared meals consisting primarily of pasta or rice; oat-based food; foodstuffs made from corn; foodstuffs made of rice; foodstuffs made of cereals; prepared savory foodstuffs made from potato flour; prepared foodstuffs in the form of sauces; processed cereals for food for human consumption; condiments; vegetable-based seasonings for pasta; alimentary seasonings; seasonings for food; food dressings (sauces); crêpes; croûtons; curry (condiments); couscous; couscous (semolina); whole wheat grains being precooked; whole wheat grains being cooked; lasagna; macaroni; prepared pearl barley; barley prepared for human consumption; pasta containing eggs; filled pasta; pasta-based prepared meals; cereal preparations; cereals food products; pasta-based canned products; quinoa, processed; prepared ravioli; pasta sauce; pesto; sauces for foodstuffs; cooking sauces; canned sauces; sauces for pasta; meat gravies; pasta containing stuffings; macaroni with cheese; pasta for soups; canned spaghetti in tomato sauce; canned spaghetti; boxed lunches consisting of rice, with added meat, fish or vegetables; entrees consisting primarily of pasta or riceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 25, 2025NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Jul 27, 2024FINOFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 8, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jul 7, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jul 21, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 6, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 28, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jun 28, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jan 9, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 20, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 20, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Oct 8, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Oct 7, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 8, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 8, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 3, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Jan 31, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Jan 27, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance