USPTO serial 79331890
SITRAFFIC VERSATOLL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SITRAFFIC VERSATOLL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric signaling, measuring, counting, recording, monitoring, controlling, regulating and switching devices; electric apparatus for the input, processing, transmission, storage and output of data; electronic instruments and apparatus for data capture and control; electrical warning systems; electrical signal centres; alarm and alert systems; signal transmission and display devices; remote control of signals; traffic control apparatus [electronic]; electric and electronic traffic management apparatus; traffic control apparatus [luminous]; instruments for monitoring traffic; apparatus for navigation, position-finding and locating; data processing apparatus and computers, including peripheral devices therefor; computers for autonomous-driving; data processing programs; interactive computer software; mobile apps | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Traffic information; organising traffic by means of new communications networks and technologies | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical planning, research and technical development of installations, devices and apparatus, in particular in the field of road traffic technology, operating systems and traffic control systems; technological consultancy and technical expertise in the field of road traffic technology, operating systems and traffic control systems; creation and rental of data processing and process technology programs; technical project management in the field of operating systems and traffic control systems; technical/scientific consultancy in the field of traffic monitoring, traffic control and traffic management; design and development of computer hardware and software; technological consultancy; conducting technical project studies; technical project management in the field of electronic data processing; services of an edp programmer; maintenance and installation of software; software as a service [saas]; platform as a service (paas); hosting platforms on the internet; cloud computing | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 1, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |