USPTO serial 79332102
MIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YI, CRYSTAL HAEIN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software; databases (electronic); computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; downloadable software applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Financial consultancy; insurance underwriting; insurance consultancy; providing information relating to stock exchange, financial, foreign exchange market, customs and export conditions (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); financial customs brokerage services; reclamation of import duties for others; financial management; electronic funds transfer; collecting information relating to the liabilities and creditworthiness of others and providing said information via computers (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); electronic funds transfers and transactions, debt collection agencies; clearing, financial; arranging the payment of customs duties | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software development, programming and implementation; hosting services, software as a service, and rental of software (term considered too vague by the International Bureau - rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); maintenance and updating of computer software; cloud hosting provider services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 2, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2023 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Oct 5, 2022 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 4, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Feb 9, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |