USPTO serial 79332141
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James J. Bitetto
James J. Bitetto Tutunjian & Bitetto, P.C.401 Broadhollow Road, Suite 402Melville, NY 11747UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic navigational and positioning apparatus and instruments; tracking apparatus and instruments, namely, indoor localization and tracking system; remote control apparatus and instruments, namely, remote controls for operating vehicle alarms; wearable safety electronic devices capable of emitting light signals and vibrations, namely, wearable electronic sensors; wearable safety devices, namely, electronic devices that communicate the location of a person or an object in an area, namely, wearable indoor positioning system; alarm systems primarily comprised of electronic radiofrequency sensors and protection mechanisms in the nature of acoustic, light and vibration warning notifications for human users and adaptation of automatic vehicle behavior to slow down or stop, all of which use ultrabroadband communication systems; alarm systems primarily comprised of electronic radiofrequency sensors and protection mechanisms in the nature of acoustic, light and vibration warning notifications for human users and adaptation of automatic vehicle behavior to slow down or stop, all of which are managed by a recorded software platform that allows self-driving vehicles and laser guided vehicles to detect operators and manually guided vehicles moving in an area, avoiding collisions between people and objects | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 23, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 21, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 13, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 12, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |