USPTO serial 79332445
ARTIFEEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUTLAND, BARBARA A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ARTIFEEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scientific apparatus and instruments; photographic apparatus and instruments; optical apparatus and instruments; weighing apparatus and instruments; measuring apparatus and instruments; signaling apparatus and instruments; checking (monitoring) apparatus and instruments; sound recording apparatus; sound transmission apparatus; sound reproduction apparatus; image recording apparatus; image transmission apparatus; digital recording media; data processing equipment; computers; software (recorded programs); detectors; integrated circuit cards [smart cards]; electric batteries | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications; providing access to databases | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical evaluations concerning design (engineers' services); scientific research; technical research; design of computers for third parties; computer development; software design; software development; research and development of new products for third parties; conducting of technical project studies; architecture; design of interior decor; software development (design); software installation; maintenance of software; updating of software; software rental; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; consultant services with respect to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; software as a service (SAAS); cloud computing; information technology (IT) consultancy; hosting of servers; motor vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts design services; styling (industrial design); authentication of works of art; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Security services for the protection of material assets and persons | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 22, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2023 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 15, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 14, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |