USPTO serial 79332618
CRIME SCENE GAME
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, KATHERINE S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CRIME SCENE GAME?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for creating and providing computer games and movies; games software for creating and providing computer and virtual reality games; video games for mobile devices; mobile games applications for mobile phones, personal computers, consoles, tablets for creating and providing mobile games; electronic games programs for creating and providing games; downloadable electronic games programs for creating and providing games; computer games programs for creating and providing games; video game software | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Games, toys; playthings; video game apparatus; board games; card games; party games; hobby games; table games; skill games; memory games; games for the brain; educational games; development games; playing cards; puzzles; jig-saw puzzles; games consoles; hand-held consoles for playing video games; plush toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 24, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 5, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 1, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Apr 11, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |