Drawing for APLUS

USPTO serial 79332772

APLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
YOO,JEANE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with APLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Scientific and technological services, in particular in the field of coating of substrates; technical research services in the field of galvanization, in particular for zinc and zinc alloys; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; technical consultancy services relating to product development; advisory services relating to research in the field of environmental protectionSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 5, 2026DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Aug 4, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Jun 24, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Jun 24, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 23, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 23, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 29, 2023CORRCORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED—
Jan 9, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 2, 2023CRCVCORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB—
Dec 10, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 9, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 26, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 19, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Feb 15, 2022ADCHCHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB—
Feb 15, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2022SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance