USPTO serial 79332798
DYAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 762
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NUNLEY, CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DYAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MATTHEW J. SMITH
MATTHEW J. SMITH POLSINELLI PCPO BOX 140310KANSAS CITY, MO 64114-0310UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Database management; computer database management; database management and reporting services for business purposes; computerized database management services; data processing management; compilation of data and information in computer databases for business purposes; data processing and analysis services; maintain online patient medical record services, other than dentistry, for administrative purposes; information, advisory and services in relation to all of the aforesaid | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Medical Services; human healthcare services; health care services; health centres; medical clinics; medical clinic services; medical assistance; pharmacy advice in the nature of pharmaceutical consultation; medical advisory services; medical treatment services; diagnostic services; medical analysis services; telemedicine services; therapy services; psychologist services; psychiatric services; mental health services medical advisory services relating to medical instruments; medical information services provided via internet; medical psychological and psychiatric services provided remotely via a computer software application; medical psychological and psychiatric services provided remotely via software applications for mobile telephones, tablet computers and other portable electronic devices; none of the aforesaid relating to food and dietary supplements; none of the aforesaid being services relating to interpreting and analyzing medical images | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 26, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Feb 9, 2024 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2024 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 8, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 9, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 30, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 6, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 5, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |