USPTO serial 79332968
NSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRAVTSOFF, ELENA V N
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recording apparatus; data recorders; railway signaling devices; devices for safety, security, protection and signaling; signaling apparatus; positioning apparatus and instruments; global positioning instruments [GPS]; indoor location systems; computer hardware for the transmission of location data; global positioning system receivers [GPS receivers]; devices for personnel tracking; data transmission apparatus; computer hardware for the transmission of location data; data transmission cables; wireless communication devices enabling voice, data or image transmission; computer software for the transmission of location data; computer hardware; computer servers; computer modules; electronic navigation and positioning apparatus and instruments; security cameras; security alarms; security software; safety markers; luminous safety beacons; personal security alarms; flight control apparatus; recording apparatus; telephone recorders; electric recorders; digital video recorders; data recorders; intelligent gateways for real-time data analysis; optical devices for target localization; electronic devices for tracking targets; night vision apparatus; night vision devices for aviators; remote controls; electronic remote control apparatus; electric remote control apparatus; remote controls for vehicle alarms; remote controls for points of entry; software for the remote control of security apparatus | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Electronic data transmission; transmission of telephone calls; data transmission; electronic data transmission; digital transmission of data; computer data transmission services; services for the secure transmission of data, sound or images; telephone communication services provided for hotlines and call centers | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom assembling of electronic components; custom assembling of electronic components for communication devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2023 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 16, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 16, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 15, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |