USPTO serial 79333009
PRODIGEE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHANG, ELIZABETH YI HSUAN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PRODIGEE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paulo A. de Almeida
Paulo A. de Almeida Patel & Almeida, P.C.22543 Ventura Blvd., Ste. 220 #1200Woodland Hills, CA 91364UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Bicycles, their parts and fittings, namely, frames, tubes and connectors for bicycle frames, headsets which provide a rotatable interface between the bicycle fork and the bicycle frame, forks, fork crown covers, handlebars, handle bar ends, stems, shock absorbers, brakes, brake levers for cycles, bicycle brake lever grips, saddles, seat posts, wheels, wheel hubs, rear wheel sprockets, freewheels, pedals, cranks, chains, derailleurs, gear; bags for bicycles being panniers; bicycle bells; pushchair hoods; shopping trolleys; transport carriages, namely, baby carriages; small wagons for transporting children; carts; wheelbarrows; pushchairs; baskets adapted for bicycles; safety belts for vehicle seats; pushchair covers; vehicle safety seat cushions; seat cushions adapted for use in vehicles; directional indicators for bicycles; vehicle windscreens; bicycle mudguards; vehicle bumpers; bumpers for trolleys; pet strollers; buggies being baby buggies; head-rests for automobile seats; luggage carriers for vehicles; water bottle cages for bicycles; dress guards for bicycles; bicycle trailers; casters for trolleys; safety seats for children, for vehicles; vehicle seats; pet safety seats for use in vehicles; vehicle booster seats for children; children's seats for bicycles; children's bicycle seats; bicycle carriers for vehicles; tricycles not being toys; land vehicles for animal transport; land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2026 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Feb 8, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 4, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 14, 2022 | RFWR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 21, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 20, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| May 14, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |