USPTO serial 79333252
PINGLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAUENSTEIN, HOLLAND LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PINGLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; computer game software, downloadable; computer game software, recorded; computer software, recorded; computer software applications, downloadable; computer programs, recorded; computer operating programs, recorded; computer software platforms, recorded or downloadable; downloadable ring tones for mobile phones; animated cartoons | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer system analysis; information technology services provided on an outsourcing basis; industrial design; packaging design; off-site data backup; research and development of new products for others; duplication of computer programs; electronic data storage; providing information relating to computer technology and programming via a website; providing search engines for the internet; technological consultancy; telecommunications technology consultancy; computer security consultancy; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware, website design consultancy; quality control, updating of computer software; digitization of documents [scanning]; conducting technical project studies; weather forecasting; software as a service [SaaS]; graphic arts design; interior design; computer software design; rental of web servers; software development in the framework of software publishing; conducting technical project studies, creating and designing website-based indexes of information for others [information technology services]; technological consultancy; cloud computing; styling [industrial design] | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 31, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 11, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 28, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |