USPTO serial 79333308
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John C. Holman
John C. Holman Jacobson Holman PLLC400 7th St., NW, Ste. 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal materials for construction, namely, braces; metal hardware namely, bolts and washers; building hardware of metal, namely, espagnolettes, corner elements, door bolts, door stops, closure elements; window and door furniture of metal, namely, handles; shutters of metal; ironwork for windows, namely, wrought iron decorative artwork; fittings of metal for doors and windows; door and window frame elements, of metal, namely, frames; sliding fittings, namely, runners of metal for windows and doors; tilt and turn fittings for windows; door handles of metal; window and door handles of metal; door holders of metal; blind pulls of metal; window fasteners of metal; metal rollers for sliding doors; non-magnified metal door viewers; strap-hinges of metal; window casement bolts of metal; metal gate latches; door closers, non-electric, namely, self-closing hinges of metal; door bolts of metal; metal hinges for doors and windows; metal joinery fittings; fittings of metal for furniture; metal furniture sliders; drawer sliders of metal; metal clips for general use; latch bars of metal; hasps of metal; cramps of metal and crampons; screws of metal; nuts of metal; metal dead bolts; pivots of metal; locks and keys, of metal; locks of metal for vehicles; metal locks for windows, metal locks for doors; metal sash locks; spring locks of metal other than electric; anti-theft locks of metal other than electric or for electronic devices; lock parts of metal, namely, metal locksets; lock bolts of metal; lock casings of metal; metal locking mechanisms; striking plates of metal for locks; metal locksets; metal lock bolts; lock barrels of metal; key hole plates of common metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electronic locks; electronic door locks; locks, electric; electric door locks; electric locks for vehicles; electric locks for bicycles; electric locks with alarms; electromagnetic locks; electric combination locks of metal; electric combination locks of non-metal; electric mechanical locks of metal; smart locks; smart door locks; biometric fingerprint locks; electric deadbolt locks; safety locking devices, namely, electric locks; radio-frequency controlled locks; radio operated door lock controls; digital door locks; wireless smart locks; cables, electric; electric power supply units, namely, power supplies; none of the aforementioned goods being related to access control software | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Door, gate and window handles, not of metal; door and window fasteners, not of metal; spring locks other than electric of non-metal; non-metal tumblers being parts of locks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 14, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 7, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 29, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Sep 20, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Feb 15, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |