USPTO serial 79333737
ISITEPOWER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GANESH, HARINI
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 130 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISITEPOWER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Laptop computers; computers; computer software, recorded; computer hardware; humanoid robots with artificial intelligence; tablet computers; data processing apparatus; smartwatches [data processing apparatus]; processors [central processing units]; network communication equipment; smartphones; television apparatus; cabinets for loudspeakers; chips [integrated circuits]; charging stations for electric vehicles; photovoltaic cells; accumulators, electric; chargers for electric accumulators; mobile power supply [rechargeable batteries]; batteries, electric, for vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technological research; providing scientific information, advice and consultancy relating to carbon offsetting; technological consultancy in the field of alternative energy generation; energy research; research on reducing carbon emissions; consultancy in the field of energy-saving; research in the field of environmental protection; quality control; telecommunications technology consultancy; research in the field of telecommunications technology; design of integrated circuits; computer software design; consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; computer system design; duplication of computer programs; computer software consultancy; software as a service [SaaS]; cloud computing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 25, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 18, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 26, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |