USPTO serial 79333910
SCAILEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BECKER, JOSEPH RAPHAEL
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCAILEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Stored computer software, customer relationship management software [CRM]; data management software; database server software; workflow applications, especially for legal services and in the legal tech sector; document automation software; computer programmes for data processing; software for office organization, especially for legal services and in the legal tech sector; software for digital document management, especially for legal services and in the legal tech sector | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Office services for electronically manipulating data; office services for electronically collecting data; office functions services; office services for electronically collating data; market campaigns; office services for lawyers; office services for legal services and in the legal tech sector; advertising and marketing, especially for (legal) law firms and/or in the legal tech sector; online advertising and marketing services, in particular for (legal) law firms and/or in the legal tech sector; automated processing of legal data | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a Service [SaaS] especially for legal services and in the legal tech sector; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software; providing temporary use of non-downloadable software applications accessible via a web site; providing temporary use of web-based software; consulting services in the field of software as a service [SaaS]; platforms for artificial intelligence as software as a service [SaaS]; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for the management of data; cloud- based data protection services; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable operating software for accessing and using a cloud computing network; rental of computer software; rental of computer programs; custom design of software packages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 4, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 19, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 12, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |