Drawing for IOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE

USPTO serial 79333998

IOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 600: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with IOT SEE THE DIFFERENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Andrew Goldstein

Mark Andrew Goldstein SoCal IP Law Group LLP310 N. Westlake Blvd, Ste 120Westlake Village, CA 91362United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for use in design, optimization and production of spectacle lensesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2026FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 9, 2026FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 9, 2026FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 5, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2025MAB0ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 29, 2025ABN0ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE—
Jul 29, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 28, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 2025ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2025GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jan 28, 2025GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 28, 2025CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 9, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 13, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 10, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 10, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jul 26, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Jul 26, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Feb 8, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 6, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 26, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jul 6, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jul 6, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Jun 17, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Jun 16, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2022RFWRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) WITHDRAWN FOR REVIEW—
May 3, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
May 2, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 3, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance