USPTO serial 79334299
REALCOLLECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLAKESLEE, RICHARD A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REALCOLLECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable cryptographic keys for receiving and spending cryptocurrency; downloadable computer security software; computer software to enable searching of data; data processing software; database management software; computer software for application and database integration; computer software for encryption; instant messaging software; software for searching and retrieving information across a computer network; computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer programming services for data warehousing; data security services; data encryption and decoding services; development of systems for the storage of data; development of systems for data processing; software as a service in the field of blockchain technology [SaaS]; platform as a service in the field of blockchain technology [PaaS]; software design and development; application service provider via blockchain technology [ASP]; design and development of electronic data security systems; electronic data storage services; maintenance of software used in the field of e-commerce; electronic data storage; data conversion of electronic information; design and development of computer networks; development of computer database software | SECTION 70 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 17, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 30, 2023 | DENA | NOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2023 | DETH | DEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 26, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 13, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 18, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |