Drawing for MYMETA

USPTO serial 79334692

MYMETA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BIBB, SCOTT
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MYMETA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Tucker

Brian Tucker Kirton McConkie36 S. State Street, #1900Salt Lake City, UT 84111United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable computer software for facilitating companies in digital adoption, namely adopting and adapting any digital application, supporting users, employees and customers with a tailored user experience, reducing input errors and dropout cases, none of the foregoing for use in connection with software for social networking or photo- or video- sharing or editing or virtual reality softwareACTIVE—
042Upgrading of computer software for facilitating companies in digital adoption namely adopting and adapting any digital application, supporting users, employees and customers with a tailored user experience, reducing input errors and dropout cases; rental of computer software for facilitating companies in digital adoption, namely adopting and adapting any digital application, supporting users, employees and customers with a tailored user experience, reducing input errors and dropout cases; writing computer software for facilitating companies in digital adoption namely adopting and adapting any digital application, supporting users, employees and customers with a tailored user experience, reducing input errors and dropout cases, none of the foregoing for use in connection with software for social networking or photo- or video- sharing or editing or virtual reality softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 11, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 20, 2025TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 20, 2025CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 20, 2025ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 8, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2023ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 9, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 9, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
May 10, 2023GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 10, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 21, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 21, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 12, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 9, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 4, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Dec 13, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Dec 12, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Sep 29, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Sep 28, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 10, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance