USPTO serial 79334740
PLANT PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACFARLANE, JAMES W
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PLANT PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat substitutes; seitan [meat substitute]; vegetable based meat substitutes; vegetable-based meat substitutes; meat substitutes prepared from cereals; prepared meals consisting primarily of meat substitutes; prepared meals consisting wholly or substantially of meat; ready cooked meals consisting wholly or substantially of meat; formed textured vegetable protein for use as a meat substitute; meat; crab meat; meatballs; cold meats; dried meat; fresh meat; fried meat; meat floss; meat paste; meat pates; salt meats; canned meat; corned meat; cubed meats; cured meats; dried meats; frozen meat; ground meat; meat salads; meat stocks; non-dairy cream; non-dairy butter; non-dairy cheese; non-dairy creamer; non-dairy yoghurt; non-dairy whiteners; non-alcoholic eggnog; non-dairy milk substitutes; non-milk whiteners for beverages; non-dairy whiteners for beverages; non-alcoholic milk beverages, milk predominating; non-stick vegetable oil sprays for use in cooking | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 11, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 20, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 20, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 22, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 9, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |