USPTO serial 79334967
KERNIK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARMON, RAYMOND E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KERNIK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Rust preservatives in the nature of a coating; rust preservatives for heaters; anti-rust solutions for metals; anti-rust spray coatings for screws; rust protecting paints; rust inhibiting preparations in the nature of a coating for use on vehicles; rust inhibiting preparations in the nature of a coating for use on automobile bodies; anti-rust oils; anti-rust greases; paint primers for packaging materials use in industry; building paints; anti-rust coatings; anti-rust solutions for radiator; anti-rust solutions for forming and shaping molds; anti-rust varnish; paints for use in the automobile industry; paints for use in the chemical industry; coatings for wood as paints; coatings for plastic as paints; reflective coatings for metals as paints; paints for protection against stain for use with boats; automobile paints; varnishes for use as surface coating; anti-corrosive agents for metal; coatings for metal in the nature of paint; preservative coatings for wood surfaces; protective coatings for automobile bodies; wall coatings in the nature of paint; enamel paints; waterproof paints; coatings in the nature of foam for automobile; varnishes for tires of automobiles and motorcycles; floor protection varnishes; metal varnishes in the nature of a liquid coating; plastic glazes in the nature of a liquid coating; liquid colorant coatings for ceramics; liquid colorant coatings for tiles; anti-rust paint primers; anti-rust coatings in the nature of paint for exterior and interior materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Mar 11, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 26, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 25, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 17, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |