USPTO serial 79335055
WIZE BAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MORRIS, KRISTINA KLOIBER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WIZE BAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marius J. Jason
4955 Shankland RdWilloughby, OH 44094-5636UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Display screen protectors in the nature of films for mobile phones; keyboard cases for smartphones; leather cases for smartphones; displays for smartphones; smartphone screen magnifiers; screen protectors for smartphones and smart watches; protective cases for smartphones and smart watches; tempered glass screen protectors for smartphones; covers for smartphones; keyboards for smartphones; cases for smartphones; liquid crystal protective films for smartphones; waterproof cases for smartphones; selfie sticks used as smartphone accessories; bags specially adapted for smart and mobile phone; face plates for cellular telephones; flip covers for mobile phones; cell phone covers; external memories for cellphones; cases adapted for mobile phones; leather cases for mobile phones; mobile telephone cases made of leather or imitations of leather; mobile telephone covers made of cloth or textile materials; mobile and smartphone car holders and styluses | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business management, business organization consultancy, and business administration; office functions; provision of an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of goods and services; business management of retail or wholesale companies; providing human resources administration services for other businesses; business management and advisory services relating to the development and operation of commercial enterprises; business management and organization consultancy; business organizational consultancy and business consultancy for the opening and management of commercial enterprises; provision of commercial information; business information; consultancy, advisory and information services relating to all the aforesaid services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 23, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 22, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 27, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 9, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 17, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 7, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 6, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |