CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for S³ SEALEDSPRINGSEAT

USPTO serial 79335272

S³ SEALEDSPRINGSEAT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 602
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCGILL, CIERRA L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with S³ SEALEDSPRINGSEAT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robbie R. Harmer

Robbie R. Harmer thyssenkrupp North America, LLC9450 SW Gemini Dr., Ste. 28424Beaverton, OR 97008UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Common metals and their alloys; metal hardware, namely, springs; metal springs; metal coil springs for general use; metal barrel springs for general use; steel; spring steels; steel alloys for springsACTIVE—
012Springs for vehicle suspension systems; leaf springs, for bodywork suspension parts for vehicles; motor vehicle suspension springs; coil springs for land vehicle being suspension parts; coil springs and linear springs being suspension parts for land vehicles; barrel springs being suspension parts for land vehicles; side-load springs being suspension parts for land vehiclesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2026NREPNEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2026CHLDCHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB—
Oct 12, 2024FINTFINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB—
Sep 23, 2024FICSFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB—
Sep 22, 2024FICRFINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Sep 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 21, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 3, 2023OPNXNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB—
Aug 16, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Mar 9, 2023GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 9, 2023GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 2023CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 17, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 18, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 18, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2022RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
May 18, 2022RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
May 18, 2022RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Apr 6, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Apr 5, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 27, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 15, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 11, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2022REPRSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance