USPTO serial 79335567
OUTSTANDING INSIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MASON, JARED MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OUTSTANDING INSIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | Ceramic insulating materials; ceramic fibers as thermal and electric insulating materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Ceramic fibers, in particular ceramic fibers including aluminium oxide, silicum oxide and zircon oxide as well as products manufactured therefrom like ceramic wool for building purposes; refractory construction materials, not of metal, containing fireclay, sillimanite, bauxite, corundum, mullite, zircon mullite, chrome corundum, spinel, magnesite and silicon carbide; refractory castables being construction materials, in particular dense castables and dense castables for gunning purposes, low cement castables, ultra low cement castables, insulating castables, insulating gunning castables, special castables; refractory construction products, in particular unshaped fireclay materials and fireclay mortar; fireclay bricks; construction bricks having a high content of aluminium including alumina, fireclay, bauxite, sillimanite, mullite and corundum; construction bricks including chrome-corundum; construction bricks including zircon oxide; construction bricks including aluminium and magnesia spinel; acid resisting bricks; mortar including ceramic binder; chemically binding mortar; vacuum formed products made of ceramic wool for buildings purposes; ceramic fiber paper, in particular on the basis of aluminium-silica fibers for building purposes; sliding gates made of ceramics for steel pouring ladles and continuous casting distributors for building purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |