Drawing for AGRI MAX

USPTO serial 79335696

AGRI MAX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 402
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARR, PATRICK C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 125

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AGRI MAX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Erica Halstead

Erica Halstead Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP950 Third Ave., Suite 2400New York, NY 10022

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001diatomaceous earth and diatomaceous earth preparations based on or made from diatomaceous earth, none containing or being based on solventsSECTION 70 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2024DENANOTIFICATION OF EFFECT OF CANCELLATION OF INTL REG E-MAILED—
Feb 5, 2024DETHDEATH OF INTERNATIONAL REGISTRATION—
Jan 17, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 16, 2023OPNSNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB—
Aug 16, 2023OPNRNOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB—
Jun 15, 2023CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 14, 2023CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 13, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 20, 2023RFNTREFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB—
Jan 25, 2023RFCSNON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB—
Jan 25, 2023RFRRREFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU—
Nov 24, 2022RFCRNON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW—
Nov 23, 2022CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2022DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 1, 2022MAFRAPPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED—
Mar 28, 2022NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Mar 23, 2022LIMILIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED—
Mar 10, 2022SDRCSN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance