USPTO serial 79335714
DEEPBOX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DEEPBOX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY D. HALLERMAN
MARY D. HALLERMAN SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.2001 K STREET NWSUITE 425 NORTHWASHINGTON, DC 2029084861Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable document and file sharing, management, and collaboration software; Software products, namely, downloadable software for data analysis, document and file tracking, recognition, analogue to digital conversion, management, organization, sharing and collaboration; Software products, namely, downloadable software for financial payment processing, financial data integration, and financial data collaboration and integration; Downloadable mobile applications for document and file scanning, sharing, management, and collaboration | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Software design, development, elaboration being design, programming, updating and maintenance; consulting services provided by consultants relating to software design, development, elaboration being design, programming, updating and maintenance; research in the field of software; rental and provision of temporary use of online non-downloadable software for data analysis, document and file tracking, recognition, analogue to digital conversion, management, organization, sharing and collaboration, financial payment processing, financial data integration, and financial data collaboration | ABANDONED | — |
| 045 | Licensing of computer software | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2026 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2024 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 16, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 20, 2023 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | OPNS | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | OPNC | OPPOSITION NOTICE (IB REFUSAL) CREATED | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2023 | GPNX | NOTIFICATION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | OP2R | NOTICE OF START OF OPPOSITION PERIOD CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 28, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| May 3, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| May 2, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 27, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 10, 2022 | SDRC | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A SUBSEQ DESIG FROM IB | — |