USPTO serial 79336053
UNFOLD3D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STEINPFAD, SARAH E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with UNFOLD3D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kaitlyn M. Garvin
Kaitlyn M. Garvin Saunders & Silverstein LLP14 Cedar StreetSuite 224Amesbury, MA 01913Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Surveying apparatus and instruments; cinematographic cameras; optical apparatus and instruments, namely, optical readers; weighing apparatus and instruments; sound recording apparatus; sound transmission apparatus; sound reproduction apparatus; image recording apparatus; image transmission apparatus; image reproduction apparatus; mechanisms for coin-operated apparatus; cash registers; calculating machines; data processing equipment; computers; tablet computers; smartphones; electronic book readers; downloadable game software; recorded software programs for UV mapping; computer peripheral devices; ; electric wires; electric relays; diving suits; diving gloves; diving masks; clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; fire extinguishers; 3D spectacles; virtual reality headsets; eyewear; spectacle cases; integrated circuit cards being blank smart cards; bags designed for laptop computers; smart watches; electric batteries; batteries for electronic cigarettes; charging stations for electric vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Engineering services, namely, technical consulting in the nature of providing technical evaluations concerning design in the field of UV mapping engineering; scientific research; technical research in the field of UV mapping; design of computers for third parties; computer hardware and software development; software design; software development; research and development of new products for third parties; conducting of technical project studies, namely, technical research in the field of 3D modellng; design of interior decor; software development and design; computer software installation; maintenance of computer software; updating of computer software; software rental, namely, rental of computer software for UV mapping; programming for computers; computer system analysis; computer system design; consultant services with respect to computer hardware design and development; digitization of documents; software as a service (SaaS) services featuring software for in the field of UV mapping; cloud computing services featuring software in the field of UV mapping; information technology (IT) consultancy; infrastructure as a service (IAAS) services, namely, hosting of servers for use by others; motor vehicle roadworthiness testing; graphic arts design services; styling in the nature of (industrial design); authentication of works of art; energy auditing; electronic data storage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 14, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 23, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 28, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 7, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 25, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |