USPTO serial 79336141
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark D. Schneider
Vmax Global AG VMAX Group AG,| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electric accumulators for vehicles, namely for motorized, electric-powered, self-propelled, and self-balancing wheeled personal mobility transportation devices, self-balancing scooters, self-balancing electric scooters, electrically powered skateboards, electric scooters and electric standing wheelchairs; mains chargers, especially for electric batteries or electric accumulators; charging columns and stations for electric vehicles, namely for motorized, electric-powered, self-propelled, and self-balancing wheeled personal mobility transportation devices, self-balancing scooters, self-balancing electric scooters, electrically powered skateboards, electric skateboards, electrically powered scooters and electric standing wheelchairs; equipment, apparatus and installations for analysing energy consumption and for storing energy, namely, screens and cables for displaying energy levels, charging sockets, batteries, chargers, and power packs; batteries for electric vehicles, namely for motorized, electric-powered, self-propelled, and self-balancing wheeled personal mobility transportation devices, self-balancing scooters, self-balancing electric scooters, electrically powered skateboards, electric skateboards, electrically powered scooters and electric stand-up wheelchairs; battery charge monitors; battery charge indicators; electrical charging plugs and charging sockets for vehicles namely for motorized, electric-powered, self-propelled, and self-balancing wheeled personal mobility transportation devices, self-balancing scooters, self-balancing electric scooters, electric skateboards, self-balancing powered skateboards, electric-powered scooters and electric standing wheelchairs; none of the aforesaid for use with model vehicles, remote-controlled toy vehicles, or parts and accessories therefor. | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Electric vehicles, namely, electrically powered hoverboards and electrically powered skateboards; self-balancing electric scooters; electric self-propelled vehicles, namely, self-propelled electric hoverboards and self-propelled electric skateboards; electric powered scooters, electric standing wheelchairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Electrically powered hoverboards, electrically powered skateboards, electric scooters; none of the aforesaid being remote controlled or being or for use in connection with model vehicles, remote controlled toy vehicles, or parts and accessories therefor | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 2026 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2026 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2024 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 16, 2024 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 8, 2024 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| May 8, 2024 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2024 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 12, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 12, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 8, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 9, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 27, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | CORN | CORRECTION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | LIME | LIMITATION FROM THE IB - REQUEST EXAM REVIEW | — |
| Jan 4, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 26, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 11, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Dec 10, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Nov 5, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |