USPTO serial 79336644
BIZPAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BENMAMAN, ALICE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIZPAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial affairs; monetary affairs; payment and transaction services; computerised financial services and transfer of funds; electronic funds transfer; money transfer services; electronic payment services, including remote payment services; bill payment services; payment of bills, debts, and accounts for others; collection of payments, fees and debts for others; provision of transactional services including the transfer of debts; prepayment services; provision of finance; commercial financing; invoice financing; receivables finance; trade finance; factoring; internet and online payment and payment management services; internet and online financial account management services; transaction authentication and verification services; transaction and payment authentication, verification and settlement services; debt payment services; electronic processing of credit and debit transactions; automated and electronic funds transfer services; advisory, consultancy and support services relating to the aforesaid services; providing information, including online, relating to the aforesaid services; all of the aforesaid services also provided via an online communications network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 3, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2023 | LIMN | LIMITATION FROM THE IB EXAMINED, NO ACTION IS NEEDED | — |
| Nov 8, 2022 | RFNP | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 20, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 19, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Aug 28, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Aug 27, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | LIMG | LIMITATION OF GOODS RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jun 19, 2022 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |