USPTO serial 79336710
M MAMMUT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUSSAIN, TASNEEM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 118- EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with M MAMMUT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Hunsinger
Molly Hunsinger Ladas & Parry LLP224 S. Michigan Ave., Ste. 1600Chicago, IL 60604UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Lifting work platforms; hydraulic elevating jacks; elevating work platforms; screwdrivers, electric; screwdrivers, pneumatic; impact wrenches; rack and pinion hydraulic jacks; pneumatic controls for machines, motors and engines; hydraulic controls for machines, motors and engines; mechanical lifts for lifting and storing land vehicles; jacks, namely, lifting jacks other than hand operated; pneumatic jacks; hydraulic lifting tables; mechanical elevating work platforms; stands for lifting machines; all the foregoing for use in mining and quarrying | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 2, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 30, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 6, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 18, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 17, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 17, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 5, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 8, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 7, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 13, 2022 | CORR | CORRECTION FROM IB ENTERED - NO REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| May 14, 2022 | CRCV | CORRECTION TRANSACTION RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |