USPTO serial 79336718
SEKURITANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAUENSTEIN, HOLLAND LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SEKURITANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Recorded content | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Business assistance, management and administrative services; business analysis and information services, and market research; arranging subscriptions of the online publications of others (terms linguistically incorrect in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); arranging subscriptions to publications for others; arranging subscriptions to telecommunication services [for others]; arranging subscriptions to internet services; subscriptions to electronic journals; subscriptions to telecommunications database services (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); arranging subscriptions to information media; arranging subscriptions to media packages; arranging subscriptions to information packages; subscriptions (arranging -) to a telematics, telephone or computer service [internet]; advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Provision of prepaid cards and tokens (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); financial, monetary and banking services; advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Development services relating to computer software application solutions; web hosting services; website hosting services; hosting of servers; software as a service; rental of software; rental of computer hardware and facilities; IT consultancy, advisory and information services; it security, protection and restoration (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); data duplication and conversion services, data coding services (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); computer analysis; computer project management services; data mining; digital watermarking; computer services (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); technological services relating to computers; computer network services; updating of memory banks of computer systems; data migration services; updating websites for others; monitoring of computer systems by remote access; science and technology services (terms too vague in the opinion of the International Bureau ? Rule 13 (2) (b) of the Regulations); testing, authentication and quality control; design services; computer diagnostic services; research services; software research; computer research services; development of computers; computer systems development; development of computer software; development of computer codes; development of computer platforms; computer system design and development; software development, programming and implementation; implementation of computer programs in networks; computer system analysis; rental, hire and leasing in connection with the aforesaid, included in the class; advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
| 045 | Legal services; advice, consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEKURITANCE SOLUTIONS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named SEKURITANCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 5, 2024 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 15, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 16, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Aug 30, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 13, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 20, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jun 30, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Jun 16, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 29, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |