USPTO serial 79337356
DRONEMASK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BEVERLY, JOSETTE MICHELLE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DRONEMASK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Martinez
Marcus Martinez Fox Swibel Levin & Carroll LLP200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3000Chicago, IL 60606UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio- and video-receivers; instruments containing eyepieces, namely, a headset with a patented unibody lens system that provides an enlarged view of live video feed from a camera drone on a mobile phone screen; bags specially adapted for cameras and photographic equipment; cell phone straps; photographic, cinematographic and optical apparatus and instruments, namely, a headset with a lens for viewing live video feed from camera drones on a mobile phone screen, display screens for use in first-person view headsets, and accessory for camera drones; picture projectors; video reproducing apparatus; combination video players and recorders; apparatus for transmitting and reproducing sound or images; headsets for mobile telephones; anti-glare glasses; audiovisual teaching apparatus, namely, first-person view headset with lens for viewing video feed from camera drone on a mobile phone screen for educational purposes in the field of drone technology and photography; cases for smartphones; optical apparatus and instruments; mobile phone covers; covers for smartphones; wearable video display monitors; corrective glass lenses; optical lenses; apparatus for the input, output, transmission and storage of data, namely, USB cables and adapters; apparatus for the reproduction of sound or images; carrying cases adapted for mobile phones; multimedia projectors; magnifying eyeglasses; eyewear; video projectors; video transmission apparatus; apparatus and instruments for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; apparatus for the transmission of sound or images; cases adapted for mobile phones; cinematographic machines and apparatus; apparatus for recording, transmission or reproduction of sound or images; augmented reality glasses | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Outdoor toys, namely, accessories for toy drones in the form of a headset with a patented unibody lens system that provides an enlarged view of live video feed from a camera drone on a mobile phone screen; amusement apparatus adapted for use with an external display screen or monitor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2023 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2023 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Dec 14, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 26, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |