USPTO serial 79337479
ORBITADOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALLEN, BIANCA LEIGH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 123 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ORBITADOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Information technology and audio-visual, multimedia and photographic devices; apparatus, instruments and cables for electricity; cable reels incorporating electric sockets (electric connections); extension cable reels; recorded content; measuring, detecting and monitoring instruments, indicators and controllers; navigation, guidance, tracking, targeting and map making devices; tripods for cameras; stationary or mobile tripods for cameras; camera tripods equipped with a seat; audio and visual and photographic devices; communications equipment; mounting racks for telecommunications hardware; mounting devices for cameras; parts and fittings for audio devices; parts and fittings for communications devices; parts and fittings of all the aforesaid goods, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Education, entertainment and sports; education, training, entertainment and sports activities; film production services; rental of visual, audiovisual and photographic equipment and facilities; rental of film equipment and accessories; rental of interactive and digital compression television equipment; audio, video and multimedia production, and photography; rental services relating to equipment and facilities for education, entertainment, sports and culture; rental, hire and leasing in relation to the aforesaid services, included in this class; consultancy and information for the aforesaid, included in the class | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2024 | FINO | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 8, 2024 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Oct 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 7, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 5, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 29, 2022 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Sep 27, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Sep 26, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 14, 2022 | LIMI | LIMITATION FROM ORIGINAL APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |