USPTO serial 79337732
KBC 1753
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BARRETT, LEAH N
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KBC 1753?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bridget A. Short
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Waterproof fabrics for textile use; fabrics made from synthetic threads; mixed fiber fabrics; viscose fabric; silk cloth; polymer coated fabrics for textile use; cotton fabrics; fabric of imitation animal skins; crepe cloth; rayon fabric; fibreglass fabrics for textile use; ramie fabric; textile fabrics for use in making clothes; textile fabrics for soft furnishings; woven fabrics for use in the manufacture of clothing for use in clean rooms; sail cloth; adhesive fabric for application by heat; lingerie fabric; woven and knitted fabrics of silk, cotton, viscose and polyester on the roll; flame resistant retardant fabrics for the manufacture of clothing and of bedding and upholstered furniture; laid scrim, knit, woven and non-woven reinforcement fabrics made of polyester, cotton, or fiberglass for industrial applications; woven fabrics of silk, cotton, viscose or polyester for textile use; woven fabrics and knitted fabrics of silk, cotton, viscose or polyester for use as a textile in the manufacture of furniture upholstery; textile fabrics for making into linens; polyurethane coated textile fabrics for making waterproof clothing; fabrics made of mixed synthetic and natural fibres, other than for insulation; textile fabrics for clothing and substitutes for textiles made from synthetic materials; coated textiles, namely, coated non-woven textile fabrics; textiles for digital printing; woven and knitted fabrics of silk, cotton, viscose or polyester | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 25, 2025 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2025 | FINT | FINAL DECISION TRANSACTION PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | FICS | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 30, 2025 | FICR | FINAL DISPOSITION NOTICE CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| May 31, 2024 | CHLD | CHANGE OF OWNER RECEIVED FROM IB | — |
| Jan 29, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 29, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2023 | OPNX | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION - PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNS | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION SENT TO IB | — |
| Sep 13, 2023 | OPNR | NOTIFICATION OF POSSIBLE OPPOSITION CREATED, TO BE SENT TO IB | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2023 | ADCH | CHANGE OF NAME/ADDRESS REC'D FROM IB | — |
| Jun 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2023 | NREP | NEW REPRESENTATIVE AT IB RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2023 | RFNT | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | RFCS | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED - REFUSAL SENT TO IB | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | RFRR | REFUSAL PROCESSED BY MPU | — |
| Nov 1, 2022 | RFCR | NON-FINAL ACTION (IB REFUSAL) PREPARED FOR REVIEW | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 21, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | MAFR | APPLICATION FILING RECEIPT MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2022 | REPR | SN ASSIGNED FOR SECT 66A APPL FROM IB | — |